Decision Workspace
mssql-tls vs tokio-rustls-acme vs tonic-tls
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
51
mssql-tls
experimentalv0.6.0
TLS negotiation for SQL Server connections (TDS 7.x and 8.0)
63
tokio-rustls-acme
growingv0.9.0
Automatic TLS certificate management using rustls
63
tonic-tls
growingv0.7.1
TLS for tonic gRPC.
Core Metrics
| mssql-tls | tokio-rustls-acme | tonic-tls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 51 | 63 | 63 |
| Total Downloads | 660 | 200.1K | 167.9K |
| 30d Downloads | 175 | 14.3K | 16.9K |
| Dependents | 12 | 107 | 31 |
| Releases | 11 | 12 | 10 |
| Last Updated | 73d ago | 79d ago | 16d ago |
| Age | 3m | 2y 10m | 1y 4m |
Health Breakdown
mssql-tls
Maintenance
16
Quality
11
Community
9
Popularity
3
Documentation
12
tokio-rustls-acme
Maintenance
15
Quality
13
Community
17
Popularity
6
Documentation
12
tonic-tls
Maintenance
19
Quality
15
Community
10
Popularity
6
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| mssql-tls | tokio-rustls-acme | tonic-tls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.6.0 | 0.9.0 | 0.7.1 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 OR MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 7 | 28 | 16 |
| Crate Size | 15KB | 45KB | 21KB |
| Features | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Yanked % | 9.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2018 | 2024 |
| MSRV | 1.85 | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 3 (team) | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •tokio-rustls-acme leads with a health score of 63/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •tokio-rustls-acme is depended on by 107 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.