Decision Workspace
ngdb vs azoth-core vs rocksolid
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
51
ngdb
experimentalv2.2.2
A high-performance, thread-safe RocksDB wrapper
55
azoth-core
experimentalv0.2.5
Core traits and types for the Azoth embedded database
54
rocksolid
growingv2.5.6
An ergonomic, high-level RocksDB wrapper for Rust. Features CF-aware optimistic & pessimistic transactions, advanced routing for merge operators and compaction filters, performance tuning profiles, batching, TTL values, and DAO macros.
Core Metrics
| ngdb | azoth-core | rocksolid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 51 | 55 | 54 |
| Total Downloads | 209 | 560 | 5.8K |
| 30d Downloads | 9 | 144 | 27 |
| Dependents | 0 | 66 | 0 |
| Releases | 7 | 11 | 16 |
| Last Updated | 143d ago | 40d ago | 128d ago |
| Age | 4m | 1m | 11m |
Health Breakdown
ngdb
Maintenance
18
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
3
Documentation
10
azoth-core
Maintenance
14
Quality
14
Community
11
Popularity
3
Documentation
13
rocksolid
Maintenance
13
Quality
18
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| ngdb | azoth-core | rocksolid | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 2.2.2 | 0.2.5 | 2.5.6 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✓ Yes | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 8 | 14 | 23 |
| Crate Size | 52KB | 23KB | 129KB |
| Features | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •azoth-core leads with a health score of 55/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •rocksolid has the most downloads (5.8K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •azoth-core is pre-1.0 — API may change.