Decision Workspace
oak-scala vs mihama vs chumsky
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
54
oak-scala
experimentalv0.0.10
High-performance incremental Scala parser for the oak ecosystem with flexible configuration, supporting functional programming and JVM ecosystem integration.
33
mihama
experimentalv0.0.1
A Modern Functional and Dependent Type Programming Language Base on Rust
64
chumsky
growingv0.12.0
A parser library for humans with powerful error recovery
Core Metrics
| oak-scala | mihama | chumsky | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 54 | 33 | 64 |
| Total Downloads | 354 | 753 | 14.4M |
| 30d Downloads | 65 | 3 | 2.8M |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 1.8K |
| Releases | 10 | 1 | 33 |
| Last Updated | 4d ago | 356d ago | 102d ago |
| Age | 5m | 11m | 4y 8m |
Health Breakdown
oak-scala
Maintenance
19
Quality
14
Community
5
Popularity
3
Documentation
13
mihama
Maintenance
3
Quality
14
Community
3
Popularity
3
Documentation
10
chumsky
Maintenance
14
Quality
10
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| oak-scala | mihama | chumsky | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.0.10 | 0.0.1 | 0.12.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0-or-later | MIT |
| Dependencies | 12 | 0 | 26 |
| Crate Size | 26KB | 487KB | 193KB |
| Features | 4 | 0 | 17 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 12.1% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | 1.65 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 2 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •chumsky leads with a health score of 64/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •chumsky is depended on by 1.8K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.