Decision Workspace
orderwal vs nano-wal vs durability
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
44
orderwal
growingv0.5.1
A generic-purpose, atomic, ordered, zero-copy read, zero-cost (in-place) write, Write-Ahead Log implementation for Rust.
56
nano-wal
growingv1.0.0
A concurrent Write-Ahead Log with CAS-based segment rotation and coalesced preadv reads
54
durability
experimentalv0.4.0
Crash-consistent persistence primitives: directory abstraction, generic WAL, checkpoints, and recovery.
Core Metrics
| orderwal | nano-wal | durability | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 44 | 56 | 54 |
| Total Downloads | 8.9K | 2.6K | 196 |
| 30d Downloads | 8 | 122 | 178 |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Releases | 10 | 7 | 5 |
| Last Updated | 510d ago | 5d ago | 1d ago |
| Age | 1y 6m | 6m | 1m |
Health Breakdown
orderwal
Maintenance
8
Quality
10
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
15
nano-wal
Maintenance
19
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
durability
Maintenance
14
Quality
13
Community
9
Popularity
3
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| orderwal | nano-wal | durability | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.5.1 | 1.0.0 | 0.4.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 15 | 4 | 8 |
| Crate Size | 76KB | 289KB | 73KB |
| Features | 7 | 0 | 1 |
| Yanked % | 50.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | 1.81.0 | — | 1.80 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •nano-wal leads with a health score of 56/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •orderwal has the most downloads (8.9K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ orderwal has not been updated in over a year.
- •orderwal, durability are pre-1.0 — API may change.