Decision Workspace
oxideav-scribe vs titanf vs wgpu_glyph
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
54
oxideav-scribe
experimentalv0.1.7
Pure-Rust vector font shaper + layout for the oxideav framework — TrueType / OTF outline access, GSUB ligatures, GPOS kerning, mark attachment, CBDT colour bitmaps. Pixel pipeline lives in oxideav-raster.
59
titanf
growingv2.5.3
Fast, safe, no_std font rasterizer written in pure Rust
58
wgpu_glyph
growingv0.28.0
A fast text renderer for wgpu, powered by glyph_brush
Core Metrics
| oxideav-scribe | titanf | wgpu_glyph | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 54 | 59 | 58 |
| Total Downloads | 1.0K | 2.2K | 914.8K |
| 30d Downloads | 1.0K | 0 | 12.5K |
| Dependents | 16 | 5 | 118 |
| Releases | 9 | 24 | 30 |
| Last Updated | 21d ago | 1d ago | 74d ago |
| Age | 22d | 7m | 7y 1m |
Health Breakdown
oxideav-scribe
Maintenance
18
Quality
11
Community
9
Popularity
4
Documentation
12
titanf
Maintenance
19
Quality
15
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
wgpu_glyph
Maintenance
15
Quality
14
Community
9
Popularity
7
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| oxideav-scribe | titanf | wgpu_glyph | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.7 | 2.5.3 | 0.28.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 5 | 4 | 7 |
| Crate Size | 1.5MB | 26KB | 90KB |
| Features | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 16.7% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | 1.80 | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •titanf leads with a health score of 59/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •wgpu_glyph has the most downloads (914.8K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •wgpu_glyph is depended on by 118 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •oxideav-scribe, wgpu_glyph are pre-1.0 — API may change.