rustio rustio.net

oxigdal-compress vs crous-compression vs trueno-zram-core

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

oxigdal-compresscrous-compressiontrueno-zram-core
Health Score525453
Total Downloads52562.1K
30d Downloads4126899
Dependents02105
Releases424
Last Updated6d ago30d ago40d ago
Age1m1m2m

Health Breakdown

oxigdal-compress
Maintenance
16
Quality
13
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
crous-compression
Maintenance
12
Quality
18
Community
7
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
trueno-zram-core
Maintenance
11
Quality
14
Community
12
Popularity
4
Documentation
12

Technical Details

oxigdal-compresscrous-compressiontrueno-zram-core
Version0.1.31.1.00.3.1
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseApache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies2257
Crate Size45KB8KB104KB
Features444
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420242021
MSRV1.851.85.01.82
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • crous-compression leads with a health score of 54/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • trueno-zram-core has the most downloads (2.1K), suggesting wider adoption.
  • trueno-zram-core is depended on by 105 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • oxigdal-compress, trueno-zram-core are pre-1.0 — API may change.