Decision Workspace
par-dfs vs tokio-rayon vs file-crawler
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
39
par-dfs
growingv0.0.7
Parallel, serial, and async dfs and bfs traversal
58
tokio-rayon
growingv2.1.0
Mix async code with CPU-heavy thread pools using Tokio + Rayon
46
file-crawler
experimentalv0.1.5
A fast, concurrent, async and customisable file crawler
Core Metrics
| par-dfs | tokio-rayon | file-crawler | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 39 | 58 | 46 |
| Total Downloads | 4.7K | 7.7M | 1.7K |
| 30d Downloads | 47 | 1.4M | 10 |
| Dependents | 2 | 275 | 0 |
| Releases | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Last Updated | 1288d ago | 1817d ago | 173d ago |
| Age | 3y 6m | 4y 12m | 6m |
Health Breakdown
par-dfs
Maintenance
4
Quality
16
Community
7
Popularity
4
Documentation
8
tokio-rayon
Maintenance
9
Quality
19
Community
13
Popularity
8
Documentation
9
file-crawler
Maintenance
11
Quality
16
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| par-dfs | tokio-rayon | file-crawler | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.0.7 | 2.1.0 | 0.1.5 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | non-standard | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 13 | 4 | 3 |
| Crate Size | 23KB | 6KB | 13KB |
| Features | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2018 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •tokio-rayon leads with a health score of 58/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •tokio-rayon is depended on by 275 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ par-dfs, tokio-rayon have not been updated in over a year.
- •par-dfs, file-crawler are pre-1.0 — API may change.