rustio rustio.net

pi_async_file vs cap-async-std vs tokio-fs

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

pi_async_filecap-async-stdtokio-fs
Health Score466255
Total Downloads25.5K182.9K13.0M
30d Downloads193468225.4K
Dependents225114339
Releases186315
Last Updated380d ago154d ago2243d ago
Age4y5y 9m8y 1m

Health Breakdown

pi_async_file
Maintenance
7
Quality
14
Community
11
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
cap-async-std
Maintenance
12
Quality
20
Community
14
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
tokio-fs
Maintenance
5
Quality
13
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
11

Technical Details

pi_async_filecap-async-stdtokio-fs
Version0.7.03.4.50.1.7
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR Apache-2.0 OR MITMIT
Dependencies578
Crate Size19KB39KB21KB
Features040
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition20182021
MSRV
Owners222 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • cap-async-std leads with a health score of 62/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • tokio-fs has the most downloads (13.0M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • tokio-fs is depended on by 339 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ pi_async_file, tokio-fs have not been updated in over a year.
  • pi_async_file, tokio-fs are pre-1.0 — API may change.