Decision Workspace
pingap-acme vs tokio-rustls-acme vs rustls-acme
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
44
pingap-acme
growingv0.13.1
ACME client for pingap
68
tokio-rustls-acme
growingv0.9.1
Automatic TLS certificate management using rustls
64
rustls-acme
growingv0.15.2
TLS certificate management and serving using rustls
Core Metrics
| pingap-acme | tokio-rustls-acme | rustls-acme | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 44 | 68 | 64 |
| Total Downloads | 1.3K | 242.6K | 515.7K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 25.8K | 26.3K |
| Dependents | 6 | 113 | 507 |
| Releases | 4 | 13 | 47 |
| Last Updated | 68d ago | 18d ago | 10d ago |
| Age | 1y | 3y | 5y 3m |
Health Breakdown
pingap-acme
Maintenance
15
Quality
11
Community
4
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
tokio-rustls-acme
Maintenance
20
Quality
13
Community
17
Popularity
6
Documentation
12
rustls-acme
Maintenance
18
Quality
14
Community
13
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| pingap-acme | tokio-rustls-acme | rustls-acme | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.13.1 | 0.9.1 | 0.15.2 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 OR MIT | Apache-2.0 OR MIT |
| Dependencies | 29 | 30 | 39 |
| Crate Size | 48KB | 51KB | 51KB |
| Features | 0 | 3 | 8 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2018 | 2018 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 3 (team) | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •tokio-rustls-acme leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •rustls-acme has the most downloads (515.7K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •rustls-acme is depended on by 507 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.