Decision Workspace
prodigy vs autom8-cli vs tetrad
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
46
prodigy
experimentalv0.4.4
Turn ad-hoc Claude sessions into reproducible development pipelines with parallel AI agents
42
autom8-cli
experimentalv0.3.0
CLI automation tool for orchestrating Claude-powered development
50
tetrad
experimentalv0.1.15
Quadruple Consensus MCP Server for Claude Code - Validates code using Codex, Gemini and Qwen
Core Metrics
| prodigy | autom8-cli | tetrad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 46 | 42 | 50 |
| Total Downloads | 3.1K | 26 | 206 |
| 30d Downloads | 27 | 4 | 17 |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Releases | 23 | 1 | 14 |
| Last Updated | 91d ago | 49d ago | 58d ago |
| Age | 6m | 1m | 2m |
Health Breakdown
prodigy
Maintenance
17
Quality
9
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
autom8-cli
Maintenance
10
Quality
9
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
tetrad
Maintenance
16
Quality
12
Community
6
Popularity
3
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| prodigy | autom8-cli | tetrad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.4.4 | 0.3.0 | 0.1.15 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 55 | 23 | 23 |
| Crate Size | 3.0MB | 1.4MB | 106KB |
| Features | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | 1.88 | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •tetrad leads with a health score of 50/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •prodigy has the most downloads (3.1K), suggesting wider adoption.