Decision Workspace
profile-inspect vs optick vs superluminal-perf
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
39
profile-inspect
experimentalv0.1.3
Analyze V8 CPU and heap profiles from Node.js/Chrome DevTools
54
optick
growingv1.3.4
Super Lightweight Performance Profiler
51
superluminal-perf
growingv0.4.0
Superluminal Performance API for adding user events to profiler captures
Core Metrics
| profile-inspect | optick | superluminal-perf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 39 | 54 | 51 |
| Total Downloads | 36 | 32.7K | 320.2K |
| 30d Downloads | 4 | 638 | 866 |
| Dependents | 0 | 35 | 36 |
| Releases | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Last Updated | 60d ago | 2060d ago | 324d ago |
| Age | 2m | 5y 7m | 6y 1m |
Health Breakdown
profile-inspect
Maintenance
10
Quality
11
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
10
optick
Maintenance
9
Quality
21
Community
10
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
superluminal-perf
Maintenance
6
Quality
17
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
9
Technical Details
| profile-inspect | optick | superluminal-perf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.3 | 1.3.4 | 0.4.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 9 | 0 | 1 |
| Crate Size | 171KB | 1.5MB | 14KB |
| Features | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2018 | 2018 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •optick leads with a health score of 54/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •superluminal-perf has the most downloads (320.2K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ optick has not been updated in over a year.
- •profile-inspect, superluminal-perf are pre-1.0 — API may change.