Decision Workspace
pulith-archive vs taro vs tarutil
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
46
pulith-archive
experimentalv0.2.0
Archive extraction with path sanitization and transactional staging
33
taro
growingv0.1.0
In-place tar file extractor for memory-limited systems
43
tarutil
growingv0.5.0
CLI utility to extract tarballs with conflicting file paths on case-insensitive operating systems
Core Metrics
| pulith-archive | taro | tarutil | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 46 | 33 | 43 |
| Total Downloads | 127 | 1.8K | 7.4K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dependents | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Releases | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Last Updated | 93d ago | 2692d ago | 929d ago |
| Age | 3m | 7y 4m | 2y 6m |
Health Breakdown
pulith-archive
Maintenance
8
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
3
Documentation
13
taro
Maintenance
1
Quality
13
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
9
tarutil
Maintenance
10
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
8
Technical Details
| pulith-archive | taro | tarutil | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.2.0 | 0.1.0 | 0.5.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | non-standard |
| Dependencies | 11 | 8 | 6 |
| Crate Size | 24KB | 71KB | 8KB |
| Features | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2018 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •pulith-archive leads with a health score of 46/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •tarutil has the most downloads (7.4K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ taro, tarutil have not been updated in over a year.