rustio rustio.net

read_lines_with_blank vs bt_file_utils vs async-fs

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

read_lines_with_blankbt_file_utilsasync-fs
Health Score435269
Total Downloads1.9K2.9K37.1M
30d Downloads94832.6M
Dependents4151.0K
Releases2518
Last Updated342d ago60d ago194d ago
Age11m1y 1m6y 10m

Health Breakdown

read_lines_with_blank
Maintenance
7
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
bt_file_utils
Maintenance
15
Quality
15
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
async-fs
Maintenance
8
Quality
19
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15

Technical Details

read_lines_with_blankbt_file_utilsasync-fs
Version0.1.10.2.02.2.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseMITGPL-3.0-onlyApache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies035
Crate Size2KB9KB19KB
Features000
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420242021
MSRV1.71
Owners111 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • async-fs leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • async-fs is depended on by 1.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • read_lines_with_blank, bt_file_utils are pre-1.0 — API may change.