Decision Workspace
remotefs-memory vs talc vs zeroize
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
44
remotefs-memory
growingv0.1.6
remotefs implementation for volatile memory. Good for testing and simulation.
71
talc
stablev5.0.3
A fast and flexible allocator for no_std and WebAssembly
68
zeroize
growingv1.8.2
Securely clear secrets from memory with a simple trait built on stable Rust primitives which guarantee memory is zeroed using an operation will not be 'optimized away' by the compiler. Uses a portable pure Rust implementation that works everywhere, even WASM!
Core Metrics
| remotefs-memory | talc | zeroize | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 44 | 71 | 68 |
| Total Downloads | 6.4K | 521.6K | 394.3M |
| 30d Downloads | 45 | 77.0K | 34.9M |
| Dependents | 2 | 128 | 21.2K |
| Releases | 7 | 27 | 45 |
| Last Updated | 495d ago | 2d ago | 179d ago |
| Age | 1y 5m | 2y 8m | 7y 5m |
Health Breakdown
remotefs-memory
Maintenance
7
Quality
14
Community
5
Popularity
5
Documentation
13
talc
Maintenance
19
Quality
21
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
zeroize
Maintenance
11
Quality
17
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| remotefs-memory | talc | zeroize | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.6 | 5.0.3 | 1.8.2 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 OR MIT |
| Dependencies | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Crate Size | 8KB | 66KB | 21KB |
| Features | 0 | 5 | 6 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 3.7% | 60.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | 1.64.0 | 1.60 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 2 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •talc leads with a health score of 71/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •zeroize has the most downloads (394.3M), suggesting wider adoption.
- •zeroize is depended on by 21.2K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ remotefs-memory has not been updated in over a year.
- •remotefs-memory is pre-1.0 — API may change.