Decision Workspace
ringkernel-graph vs cuda-oxide vs cudarc
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
44
ringkernel-graph
experimentalv0.4.2
GPU-accelerated graph algorithm primitives
41
cuda-oxide
growingv0.4.0
cuda-oxide provides a high-level, rusty wrapper over CUDA. It provides the best safety one can get when working with hardware.
70
cudarc
growingv0.19.4
Safe and minimal CUDA bindings
Core Metrics
| ringkernel-graph | cuda-oxide | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 44 | 41 | 70 |
| Total Downloads | 87 | 12.6K | 3.1M |
| 30d Downloads | 8 | 321 | 969.0K |
| Dependents | 0 | 11 | 1.3K |
| Releases | 6 | 7 | 83 |
| Last Updated | 49d ago | 1745d ago | 4d ago |
| Age | 2m | 4y 9m | 3y 6m |
Health Breakdown
ringkernel-graph
Maintenance
11
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
10
cuda-oxide
Maintenance
7
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
cudarc
Maintenance
19
Quality
15
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| ringkernel-graph | cuda-oxide | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.4.2 | 0.4.0 | 0.19.4 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0-or-later | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 6 | 2 | 5 |
| Crate Size | 31KB | 154KB | 654KB |
| Features | 2 | 0 | 45 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.4% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2018 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •cudarc leads with a health score of 70/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •cudarc is depended on by 1.3K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ cuda-oxide has not been updated in over a year.