Decision Workspace
rsomics-coverage-core vs bam_tide vs rust-htslib
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
48
rsomics-coverage-core
experimentalv0.1.0
Genome-binned BAM read-coverage primitive (deeptools countReadsPerBin port): per-bin read counts over a BGZF BAM via rsomics-bamio, shared by rsomics-bam-signal (bamCoverage) and rsomics-bam-compare (bamCompare).
44
bam_tide
experimentalv1.2.0
A fast and memory-efficient BAM processing toolkit for coverage calculation and quantification, designed as a scalable alternative to deeptools bamCoverage for large sequencing datasets. And additional BAM tools.
65
rust-htslib
stablev1.0.0
This library provides HTSlib bindings and a high level Rust API for reading and writing BAM files.
Core Metrics
| rsomics-coverage-core | bam_tide | rust-htslib | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 48 | 44 | 65 |
| Total Downloads | 57 | 18 | 568.7K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 11.2K |
| Dependents | 5 | 0 | 1.1K |
| Releases | 1 | 1 | 67 |
| Last Updated | 2d ago | 83d ago | 116d ago |
| Age | 2d | 2m | 11y 2m |
Health Breakdown
rsomics-coverage-core
Maintenance
13
Quality
14
Community
7
Popularity
2
Documentation
12
bam_tide
Maintenance
8
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
13
rust-htslib
Maintenance
13
Quality
17
Community
16
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| rsomics-coverage-core | bam_tide | rust-htslib | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.0 | 1.2.0 | 1.0.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 2 | 11 | 20 |
| Crate Size | 11KB | 42KB | 139KB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2018 |
| MSRV | 1.91 | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 2 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •rust-htslib leads with a health score of 65/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •rust-htslib is depended on by 1.1K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •rsomics-coverage-core is pre-1.0 — API may change.