Decision Workspace
s-zip vs mismall vs zip
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
51
s-zip
experimentalv0.11.3
High-performance streaming ZIP library with AES-256 encryption and async/await support - Read/write ZIP files with minimal memory footprint. Supports password protection, cloud storage, and Tokio runtime.
44
mismall
experimentalv2.0.0
Streaming Huffman compression library with AES-256-GCM encryption and archive support
69
zip
stablev8.6.0
Library to support the reading and writing of zip files.
Core Metrics
| s-zip | mismall | zip | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 51 | 44 | 69 |
| Total Downloads | 2.2K | 18 | 183.1M |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 15.3M |
| Dependents | 14 | 0 | 33.0K |
| Releases | 19 | 1 | 130 |
| Last Updated | 67d ago | 120d ago | 14d ago |
| Age | 5m | 4m | 11y 6m |
Health Breakdown
s-zip
Maintenance
15
Quality
13
Community
9
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
mismall
Maintenance
7
Quality
17
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
12
zip
Maintenance
18
Quality
14
Community
17
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| s-zip | mismall | zip | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.11.3 | 2.0.0 | 8.6.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 22 | 13 | 36 |
| Crate Size | 134KB | 110KB | 150KB |
| Features | 8 | 6 | 24 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 20.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.85.0 | 1.88 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •zip leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •zip is depended on by 33.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •s-zip is pre-1.0 — API may change.