Decision Workspace
s-zip vs rar-stream vs mismall
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
54
s-zip
experimentalv0.11.3
High-performance streaming ZIP library with AES-256 encryption and async/await support - Read/write ZIP files with minimal memory footprint. Supports password protection, cloud storage, and Tokio runtime.
52
rar-stream
experimentalv5.3.2
High-performance RAR streaming library with optional async, crypto, NAPI, and WASM support
45
mismall
experimentalv2.0.0
Streaming Huffman compression library with AES-256-GCM encryption and archive support
Core Metrics
| s-zip | rar-stream | mismall | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 54 | 52 | 45 |
| Total Downloads | 1.2K | 2.2K | 16 |
| 30d Downloads | 436 | 1.4K | 3 |
| Dependents | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Releases | 19 | 9 | 1 |
| Last Updated | 8d ago | 28d ago | 61d ago |
| Age | 3m | 1m | 2m |
Health Breakdown
s-zip
Maintenance
18
Quality
13
Community
9
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
rar-stream
Maintenance
11
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
15
mismall
Maintenance
9
Quality
17
Community
6
Popularity
1
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| s-zip | rar-stream | mismall | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.11.3 | 5.3.2 | 2.0.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT |
| Dependencies | 22 | 16 | 13 |
| Crate Size | 134KB | 230KB | 110KB |
| Features | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.85 | 1.85.0 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •s-zip leads with a health score of 54/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •rar-stream has the most downloads (2.2K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •s-zip is pre-1.0 — API may change.