Decision Workspace
sharded-slab vs slaballoc vs crossbeam-epoch
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
48
sharded-slab
growingv0.1.7
A lock-free concurrent slab.
35
slaballoc
growingv0.1.1
Safe and lockless fixed-size memory allocator for `no_std` systems
71
crossbeam-epoch
growingv0.9.20
Epoch-based garbage collection
Core Metrics
| sharded-slab | slaballoc | crossbeam-epoch | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 48 | 35 | 71 |
| Total Downloads | 447.2M | 2.8K | 544.2M |
| 30d Downloads | 23.3M | 0 | 28.0M |
| Dependents | 314 | 0 | 1.0K |
| Releases | 17 | 2 | 40 |
| Last Updated | 1013d ago | 652d ago | 7d ago |
| Age | 6y 9m | 4y 11m | 8y 7m |
Health Breakdown
sharded-slab
Maintenance
4
Quality
9
Community
13
Popularity
8
Documentation
14
slaballoc
Maintenance
3
Quality
16
Community
3
Popularity
4
Documentation
9
crossbeam-epoch
Maintenance
18
Quality
14
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| sharded-slab | slaballoc | crossbeam-epoch | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.7 | 0.1.1 | 0.9.20 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0/MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 8 | 0 | 3 |
| Crate Size | 58KB | 5KB | 48KB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Yanked % | 11.8% | 0.0% | 17.5% |
| Edition | 2018 | 2018 | 2021 |
| MSRV | 1.42.0 | — | 1.61 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 4 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •crossbeam-epoch leads with a health score of 71/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •crossbeam-epoch is depended on by 1.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ sharded-slab, slaballoc have not been updated in over a year.