rustio rustio.net

simple-chunk-allocator vs talc vs esp-alloc

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

simple-chunk-allocatortalcesp-alloc
Health Score397166
Total Downloads14.9K521.6K633.9K
30d Downloads13175.0K32.4K
Dependents15128128
Releases72710
Last Updated544d ago2d ago165d ago
Age4y2y 8m3y 8m

Health Breakdown

simple-chunk-allocator
Maintenance
5
Quality
8
Community
8
Popularity
5
Documentation
13
talc
Maintenance
19
Quality
21
Community
12
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
esp-alloc
Maintenance
10
Quality
17
Community
17
Popularity
7
Documentation
15

Technical Details

simple-chunk-allocatortalcesp-alloc
Version0.1.65.0.30.9.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseMITMITMIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies749
Crate Size27KB66KB16KB
Features0512
Yanked %100.0%3.7%0.0%
Edition202120212024
MSRV1.64.01.86.0
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • talc leads with a health score of 71/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • esp-alloc has the most downloads (633.9K), suggesting wider adoption.
  • talc is depended on by 128 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ simple-chunk-allocator has not been updated in over a year.
  • simple-chunk-allocator, esp-alloc are pre-1.0 — API may change.