Decision Workspace
singe-cufile vs singe-cufile-sys vs cudarc
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
41
singe-cufile
experimentalv0.1.0-alpha.7
Safe Rust wrappers for NVIDIA cuFile GPUDirect Storage library.
43
singe-cufile-sys
experimentalv0.1.0-alpha.7
Low-level FFI bindings for the NVIDIA cuFile GPUDirect Storage library.
68
cudarc
growingv0.19.8
Safe and minimal CUDA bindings
Core Metrics
| singe-cufile | singe-cufile-sys | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 41 | 43 | 68 |
| Total Downloads | 51 | 77 | 5.9M |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 517.9K |
| Dependents | 0 | 3 | 2.6K |
| Releases | 3 | 3 | 87 |
| Last Updated | 12d ago | 12d ago | 24d ago |
| Age | 1m | 1m | 3y 10m |
Health Breakdown
singe-cufile
Maintenance
13
Quality
15
Community
3
Popularity
2
Documentation
8
singe-cufile-sys
Maintenance
13
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
2
Documentation
8
cudarc
Maintenance
17
Quality
15
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| singe-cufile | singe-cufile-sys | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.0-alpha.7 | 0.1.0-alpha.7 | 0.19.8 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | non-standard | non-standard | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Crate Size | 25KB | 20KB | 567KB |
| Features | 4 | 3 | 68 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.3% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •cudarc leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •cudarc is depended on by 2.6K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.