Decision Workspace
singe-nccl vs singe-nccl-sys vs cudarc
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
42
singe-nccl
experimentalv0.1.0-alpha.8
Safe Rust wrappers for the NVIDIA Collective Communications Library (NCCL).
44
singe-nccl-sys
experimentalv0.1.0-alpha.7
Low-level FFI bindings for the NVIDIA Collective Communications Library (NCCL).
68
cudarc
growingv0.19.8
Safe and minimal CUDA bindings
Core Metrics
| singe-nccl | singe-nccl-sys | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 42 | 44 | 68 |
| Total Downloads | 91 | 157 | 5.9M |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 517.9K |
| Dependents | 2 | 6 | 2.6K |
| Releases | 4 | 5 | 87 |
| Last Updated | 12d ago | 12d ago | 24d ago |
| Age | 1m | 2m | 3y 10m |
Health Breakdown
singe-nccl
Maintenance
13
Quality
15
Community
4
Popularity
2
Documentation
8
singe-nccl-sys
Maintenance
13
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
3
Documentation
8
cudarc
Maintenance
17
Quality
15
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| singe-nccl | singe-nccl-sys | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.0-alpha.8 | 0.1.0-alpha.7 | 0.19.8 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | non-standard | non-standard | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Crate Size | 31KB | 7KB | 567KB |
| Features | 3 | 2 | 68 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.3% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •cudarc leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •cudarc is depended on by 2.6K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.