Decision Workspace
spow vs dioxus vs ehttp
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
49
spow
growingv0.6.0
Proof of Work for the Server and Client + WASM
70
dioxus
growingv0.7.4
Build fullstack web, desktop, and mobile apps with a single codebase.
68
ehttp
growingv0.7.1
Minimal HTTP client for both native and WASM
Core Metrics
| spow | dioxus | ehttp | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 49 | 70 | 68 |
| Total Downloads | 21.9K | 1.2M | 2.1M |
| 30d Downloads | 476 | 118.8K | 194.3K |
| Dependents | 29 | 2.0K | 1.2K |
| Releases | 7 | 48 | 9 |
| Last Updated | 332d ago | today | 4d ago |
| Age | 2y 3m | 5y 2m | 4y 6m |
Health Breakdown
spow
Maintenance
8
Quality
14
Community
10
Popularity
5
Documentation
12
dioxus
Maintenance
19
Quality
15
Community
17
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
ehttp
Maintenance
17
Quality
16
Community
16
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
Technical Details
| spow | dioxus | ehttp | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.6.0 | 0.7.4 | 0.7.1 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 9 | 28 | 15 |
| Crate Size | 111KB | 71KB | 20KB |
| Features | 4 | 26 | 5 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2018 |
| MSRV | 1.70.0 | 1.83.0 | 1.88 |
| Owners | 1 | 2 (team) | 2 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •dioxus leads with a health score of 70/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •ehttp has the most downloads (2.1M), suggesting wider adoption.
- •dioxus is depended on by 2.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.