Decision Workspace
sync-utils vs dtact-macros vs dtact
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
36
sync-utils
growingv0.1.4
A bunch of utilities in async-await and blocking context.
56
dtact-macros
experimentalv0.1.3
Macro utilities for Dtact: A non-preemptive, stackful coroutine runtime featuring a lock-free context arena, P2P mesh scheduling, and architecture-specific assembly switchers. Designed for hardware-level control and non-blocking heterogeneous orchestration.
53
dtact
experimentalv0.2.8
Dtact: A non-preemptive, stackful coroutine runtime featuring a lock-free context arena, P2P mesh scheduling, and architecture-specific assembly switchers. Designed for hardware-level control and non-blocking heterogeneous orchestration.
Core Metrics
| sync-utils | dtact-macros | dtact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 36 | 56 | 53 |
| Total Downloads | 3.8K | 985 | 1.1K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dependents | 4 | 21 | 11 |
| Releases | 5 | 4 | 17 |
| Last Updated | 361d ago | 3d ago | 3d ago |
| Age | 1y | 2m | 2m |
Health Breakdown
sync-utils
Maintenance
7
Quality
7
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
dtact-macros
Maintenance
13
Quality
14
Community
10
Popularity
4
Documentation
15
dtact
Maintenance
13
Quality
12
Community
9
Popularity
4
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| sync-utils | dtact-macros | dtact | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.4 | 0.1.3 | 0.2.8 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT or Apache-2.0 | MIT or Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 13 | 3 | 11 |
| Crate Size | 21KB | 47KB | 2.6MB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Yanked % | 100.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.90.0 | 1.90.0 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •dtact-macros leads with a health score of 56/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •sync-utils has the most downloads (3.8K), suggesting wider adoption.