Decision Workspace
taml vs sickle vs oak-yaml
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
40
taml
growingv0.0.11
A kind-to-humans configuration language.
64
sickle
experimentalv0.2.0
A robust Rust parser for CCL (Categorical Configuration Language) with Serde support
61
oak-yaml
experimentalv0.0.10
High-performance incremental YAML parser for the oak ecosystem with flexible configuration, optimized for configuration files and data serialization.
Core Metrics
| taml | sickle | oak-yaml | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 40 | 64 | 61 |
| Total Downloads | 23.3K | 3.3K | 375 |
| 30d Downloads | 83 | 1.1K | 81 |
| Dependents | 4 | 31 | 6 |
| Releases | 11 | 5 | 10 |
| Last Updated | 1699d ago | 1d ago | 4d ago |
| Age | 5y 7m | 3m | 5m |
Health Breakdown
taml
Maintenance
4
Quality
12
Community
7
Popularity
5
Documentation
12
sickle
Maintenance
21
Quality
17
Community
10
Popularity
4
Documentation
12
oak-yaml
Maintenance
19
Quality
14
Community
12
Popularity
3
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| taml | sickle | oak-yaml | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.0.11 | 0.2.0 | 0.0.10 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 16 | 7 | 13 |
| Crate Size | 25KB | 98KB | 30KB |
| Features | 0 | 11 | 4 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2018 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.80.0 | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 2 (team) |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •sickle leads with a health score of 64/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •taml has the most downloads (23.3K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ taml has not been updated in over a year.