Decision Workspace
tiered-cache vs jdb_lru vs oxcache
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
40
tiered-cache
growingv0.1.6
A high-performance multi-tiered cache with automatic sizing
42
jdb_lru
experimentalv0.1.8
Efficient LRU cache with zero-allocation alternatives / 高效LRU缓存与零分配替代方案
40
oxcache
experimentalv0.1.4
A high-performance multi-level cache library for Rust with L1 (memory) and L2 (Redis) caching.
Core Metrics
| tiered-cache | jdb_lru | oxcache | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 40 | 42 | 40 |
| Total Downloads | 5.6K | 160 | 82 |
| 30d Downloads | 3 | 43 | 8 |
| Dependents | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Releases | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Last Updated | 505d ago | 78d ago | 63d ago |
| Age | 1y 4m | 2m | 2m |
Health Breakdown
tiered-cache
Maintenance
13
Quality
7
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
jdb_lru
Maintenance
9
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
3
Documentation
8
oxcache
Maintenance
9
Quality
13
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| tiered-cache | jdb_lru | oxcache | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.6 | 0.1.8 | 0.1.4 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MulanPSL-2.0 | MIT |
| Dependencies | 11 | 6 | 49 |
| Crate Size | 14KB | 19KB | 476KB |
| Features | 0 | 3 | 32 |
| Yanked % | 85.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •jdb_lru leads with a health score of 42/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •tiered-cache has the most downloads (5.6K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •⚠ tiered-cache has not been updated in over a year.