rustio rustio.net

timelib vs dtt vs qsv-dateparser

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

timelibdttqsv-dateparser
Health Score565856
Total Downloads19.4K120.4K175.6K
30d Downloads05.0K14.3K
Dependents588180
Releases151023
Last Updated31d ago36d ago44d ago
Age3y 2m3y 5m4y 3m

Health Breakdown

timelib
Maintenance
16
Quality
14
Community
8
Popularity
5
Documentation
13
dtt
Maintenance
15
Quality
11
Community
11
Popularity
6
Documentation
15
qsv-dateparser
Maintenance
15
Quality
14
Community
9
Popularity
6
Documentation
12

Technical Details

timelibdttqsv-dateparser
Version0.3.90.0.100.15.1
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMITMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT
Dependencies2126
Crate Size1.1MB70KB45KB
Features130
Yanked %0.0%10.0%0.0%
Edition202120212024
MSRV1.88.01.95
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • dtt leads with a health score of 58/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • qsv-dateparser has the most downloads (175.6K), suggesting wider adoption.
  • qsv-dateparser is depended on by 180 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.