Decision Workspace
tinyflows vs szal vs oxigdal-workflow
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
56
tinyflows
experimentalv0.3.0
A Rust-based workflow management solution.
56
szal
experimentalv1.2.0
Workflow engine — step/flow execution with branching, retry, rollback, and parallel stages
55
oxigdal-workflow
experimentalv0.1.6
DAG-based workflow engine for complex geospatial processing pipelines
Core Metrics
| tinyflows | szal | oxigdal-workflow | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 56 | 56 | 55 |
| Total Downloads | 416 | 497 | 114 |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dependents | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Releases | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Last Updated | 10d ago | 33d ago | 27d ago |
| Age | 11d | 3m | 4m |
Health Breakdown
tinyflows
Maintenance
18
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
3
Documentation
15
szal
Maintenance
17
Quality
16
Community
8
Popularity
3
Documentation
12
oxigdal-workflow
Maintenance
20
Quality
12
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| tinyflows | szal | oxigdal-workflow | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.3.0 | 1.2.0 | 0.1.6 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | GPL-3.0-or-later | AGPL-3.0-only | Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 13 | 20 | 33 |
| Crate Size | 84KB | 124KB | 153KB |
| Features | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | 1.85 | 1.89 | 1.89 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •tinyflows leads with a health score of 56/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •szal has the most downloads (497), suggesting wider adoption.
- •tinyflows, oxigdal-workflow are pre-1.0 — API may change.