rustio rustio.net

tokio-command-fds vs command-fds vs async-process

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

tokio-command-fdscommand-fdsasync-process
Health Score375766
Total Downloads6.0K3.2M106.6M
30d Downloads0224.1K4.3M
Dependents82401.3K
Releases1928
Last Updated1492d ago94d ago302d ago
Age4y 1m5y 2m7y 1m

Health Breakdown

tokio-command-fds
Maintenance
1
Quality
14
Community
8
Popularity
5
Documentation
9
command-fds
Maintenance
12
Quality
16
Community
11
Popularity
8
Documentation
10
async-process
Maintenance
9
Quality
17
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

tokio-command-fdscommand-fdsasync-process
Version0.2.10.3.32.5.0
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseApache-2.0Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies5413
Crate Size10KB17KB28KB
Features020
Yanked %0.0%0.0%3.6%
Edition201820242021
MSRV1.71
Owners112 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • async-process leads with a health score of 66/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • async-process is depended on by 1.3K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ tokio-command-fds has not been updated in over a year.
  • tokio-command-fds, command-fds are pre-1.0 — API may change.