Decision Workspace
tokio-timerfd vs systime vs mio-timerfd
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
46
tokio-timerfd
growingv0.2.0
timerfd support for tokio
45
systime
experimentalv0.0.3
Portable timers that handle system sleep consistently.
43
mio-timerfd
growingv0.2.0
mio support for linux's timerfd
Core Metrics
| tokio-timerfd | systime | mio-timerfd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 46 | 45 | 43 |
| Total Downloads | 476.7K | 512 | 44.8K |
| 30d Downloads | 92.5K | 9 | 900 |
| Dependents | 45 | 0 | 5 |
| Releases | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| Last Updated | 1533d ago | 147d ago | 2155d ago |
| Age | 7y | 5m | 6y 6m |
Health Breakdown
tokio-timerfd
Maintenance
3
Quality
14
Community
10
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
systime
Maintenance
12
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
3
Documentation
10
mio-timerfd
Maintenance
3
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
6
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| tokio-timerfd | systime | mio-timerfd | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.2.0 | 0.0.3 | 0.2.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Dependencies | 7 | 12 | 2 |
| Crate Size | 5KB | 18KB | 6KB |
| Features | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2018 | 2024 | 2018 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •tokio-timerfd leads with a health score of 46/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •⚠ tokio-timerfd, mio-timerfd have not been updated in over a year.