Decision Workspace
tokit vs chumsky vs logosky
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
43
tokit
experimentalv0.0.0
Blazing fast parser combinators: parse-while-lexing (zero-copy), deterministic LALR-style parsing, no backtracking. Flexible emitters for fail-fast runtime or greedy compiler diagnostics
69
chumsky
growingv0.13.0
A parser library for humans with powerful error recovery
53
logosky
experimentalv0.2.0
A seamless integration layer between Logos lexer and Chumsky parser combinator, providing zero-copy TokenStream adapter and Parseable trait for building robust parsers
Core Metrics
| tokit | chumsky | logosky | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 43 | 69 | 53 |
| Total Downloads | 28 | 21.1M | 14.4K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 4.0M | 2.0K |
| Dependents | 0 | 2.1K | 26 |
| Releases | 1 | 34 | 2 |
| Last Updated | 163d ago | 20d ago | 217d ago |
| Age | 5m | 4y 10m | 7m |
Health Breakdown
tokit
Maintenance
6
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
chumsky
Maintenance
18
Quality
11
Community
20
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
logosky
Maintenance
8
Quality
15
Community
10
Popularity
5
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| tokit | chumsky | logosky | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.0.0 | 0.13.0 | 0.2.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 19 | 25 | 13 |
| Crate Size | 266KB | 195KB | 76KB |
| Features | 11 | 16 | 9 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 11.8% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2021 | 2024 |
| MSRV | 1.87 | 1.65 | 1.87 |
| Owners | 1 | 2 (team) | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •chumsky leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •chumsky is depended on by 2.1K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.