rustio rustio.net

tokmd-io-port vs async-fs vs n0-future

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

tokmd-io-portasync-fsn0-future
Health Score506963
Total Downloads5137.1M530.5K
30d Downloads512.6M190.0K
Dependents01.0K310
Releases4189
Last Updated7d ago194d ago79d ago
Age21d6y 10m1y 1m

Health Breakdown

tokmd-io-port
Maintenance
14
Quality
16
Community
5
Popularity
2
Documentation
13
async-fs
Maintenance
8
Quality
19
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
n0-future
Maintenance
16
Quality
13
Community
15
Popularity
7
Documentation
12

Technical Details

tokmd-io-portasync-fsn0-future
Version1.8.12.2.00.3.2
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MITMIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies2518
Crate Size13KB19KB36KB
Features001
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420212021
MSRV1.711.85
Owners11 (team)2 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • async-fs leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • async-fs is depended on by 1.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • n0-future is pre-1.0 — API may change.