rustio rustio.net

tokmd-io-port vs clawft-platform vs async-fs

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

tokmd-io-portclawft-platformasync-fs
Health Score545568
Total Downloads48556342.6M
30d Downloads002.9M
Dependents41201.2K
Releases82218
Last Updated6d ago39d ago253d ago
Age2m1m7y

Health Breakdown

tokmd-io-port
Maintenance
14
Quality
17
Community
7
Popularity
3
Documentation
13
clawft-platform
Maintenance
15
Quality
14
Community
11
Popularity
3
Documentation
12
async-fs
Maintenance
7
Quality
19
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15

Technical Details

tokmd-io-portclawft-platformasync-fs
Version1.11.10.6.122.2.0
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies2155
Crate Size14KB26KB19KB
Features030
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420242021
MSRV1.931.71
Owners111 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • async-fs leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • async-fs is depended on by 1.2K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • clawft-platform is pre-1.0 — API may change.