rustio rustio.net

unicode_names2 vs unicode-segmentation vs unicode-width

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

unicode_names2unicode-segmentationunicode-width
Health Score556964
Total Downloads7.5M335.5M518.8M
30d Downloads1.3M23.8M39.4M
Dependents24512.0K20.5K
Releases152619
Last Updated281d ago1d ago172d ago
Age7y 9m10y 11m10y 11m

Health Breakdown

unicode_names2
Maintenance
7
Quality
17
Community
9
Popularity
8
Documentation
14
unicode-segmentation
Maintenance
17
Quality
17
Community
16
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
unicode-width
Maintenance
9
Quality
16
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

unicode_names2unicode-segmentationunicode-width
Version2.0.01.13.20.2.2
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✓ Yes✗ No
License(MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016MIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies532
Crate Size333KB112KB283KB
Features414
Yanked %6.7%7.7%0.0%
Edition201820182021
MSRV1.63.01.85.01.66
Owners165

Quick Verdict

  • unicode-segmentation leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • unicode-width has the most downloads (518.8M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • unicode-width is depended on by 20.5K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • unicode-width is pre-1.0 — API may change.