rustio rustio.net

unicode_names2_macros vs unicode-segmentation vs unicode-width

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

unicode_names2_macrosunicode-segmentationunicode-width
Health Score486964
Total Downloads13.8K335.5M518.8M
30d Downloads4223.0M38.1M
Dependents1412.0K20.5K
Releases62619
Last Updated907d ago1d ago172d ago
Age7y 9m10y 11m10y 11m

Health Breakdown

unicode_names2_macros
Maintenance
4
Quality
21
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
12
unicode-segmentation
Maintenance
17
Quality
17
Community
16
Popularity
8
Documentation
11
unicode-width
Maintenance
9
Quality
16
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

unicode_names2_macrosunicode-segmentationunicode-width
Version1.1.01.13.20.2.2
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✓ Yes✗ No
LicenseMIT/Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies332
Crate Size2KB112KB283KB
Features114
Yanked %0.0%7.7%0.0%
Edition201820182021
MSRV1.85.01.66
Owners165

Quick Verdict

  • unicode-segmentation leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • unicode-width has the most downloads (518.8M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • unicode-width is depended on by 20.5K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ unicode_names2_macros has not been updated in over a year.
  • unicode-width is pre-1.0 — API may change.