rustio rustio.net

uoctl vs linux-ioctl vs async-fs

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

uoctllinux-ioctlasync-fs
Health Score444269
Total Downloads2.4K2.5K37.1M
30d Downloads116172.5M
Dependents991.0K
Releases2518
Last Updated255d ago256d ago194d ago
Age8m10m6y 10m

Health Breakdown

uoctl
Maintenance
8
Quality
12
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
12
linux-ioctl
Maintenance
10
Quality
8
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
12
async-fs
Maintenance
8
Quality
19
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15

Technical Details

uoctllinux-ioctlasync-fs
Version1.0.10.2.32.2.0
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✗ No✓ Yes
License0BSD0BSDApache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies115
Crate Size12KB12KB19KB
Features000
Yanked %50.0%100.0%0.0%
Edition202420242021
MSRV1.851.851.71
Owners111 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • async-fs leads with a health score of 69/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • async-fs is depended on by 1.0K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • linux-ioctl is pre-1.0 — API may change.