Decision Workspace
wfaas vs szal vs oxigdal-workflow
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
54
wfaas
experimentalv1.0.3
Workflow-as-a-Service engine for managing multi-step operations
56
szal
experimentalv1.0.1
Workflow engine — step/flow execution with branching, retry, rollback, and parallel stages
50
oxigdal-workflow
experimentalv0.1.3
DAG-based workflow engine for complex geospatial processing pipelines
Core Metrics
| wfaas | szal | oxigdal-workflow | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 54 | 56 | 50 |
| Total Downloads | 189.4K | 139 | 53 |
| 30d Downloads | 121.1K | 139 | 42 |
| Dependents | 9 | 3 | 0 |
| Releases | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Last Updated | 17d ago | today | 6d ago |
| Age | 2m | 4d | 1m |
Health Breakdown
wfaas
Maintenance
15
Quality
15
Community
8
Popularity
6
Documentation
10
szal
Maintenance
17
Quality
16
Community
8
Popularity
3
Documentation
12
oxigdal-workflow
Maintenance
16
Quality
11
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| wfaas | szal | oxigdal-workflow | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 1.0.3 | 1.0.1 | 0.1.3 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0-only | Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 9 | 19 | 31 |
| Crate Size | 36KB | 90KB | 143KB |
| Features | 0 | 7 | 4 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | — | 1.89 | 1.85 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •szal leads with a health score of 56/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •wfaas has the most downloads (189.4K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •oxigdal-workflow is pre-1.0 — API may change.