Decision Workspace
wireband-edge vs oxigdal-mqtt vs fundamentum-iot-mqtt-proto
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
50
wireband-edge
experimentalv0.4.1
Lightweight Wire.Band client — semantic data middleware for any domain (IoT, AI/ML, DeFi, legal, geospatial, supply chain, and more)
54
oxigdal-mqtt
experimentalv0.1.3
MQTT protocol support for OxiGDAL - IoT sensor data integration, pub/sub messaging, and geospatial time-series streaming
53
fundamentum-iot-mqtt-proto
growingv0.4.0
Bindings to Fundamentum IoT MQTT protos
Core Metrics
| wireband-edge | oxigdal-mqtt | fundamentum-iot-mqtt-proto | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 50 | 54 | 53 |
| Total Downloads | 56 | 53 | 4.6K |
| 30d Downloads | 56 | 42 | 125 |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 13 |
| Releases | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Last Updated | 16d ago | 6d ago | 29d ago |
| Age | 20d | 1m | 1y 9m |
Health Breakdown
wireband-edge
Maintenance
16
Quality
14
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
12
oxigdal-mqtt
Maintenance
16
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
fundamentum-iot-mqtt-proto
Maintenance
15
Quality
14
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| wireband-edge | oxigdal-mqtt | fundamentum-iot-mqtt-proto | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.4.1 | 0.1.3 | 0.4.0 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 31 | 22 | 5 |
| Crate Size | 89KB | 56KB | 23KB |
| Features | 11 | 14 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2024 | 2024 |
| MSRV | 1.75 | 1.85 | 1.85 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •oxigdal-mqtt leads with a health score of 54/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •fundamentum-iot-mqtt-proto has the most downloads (4.6K), suggesting wider adoption.