rustio rustio.net

write-to-file vs atomic-write-file vs fs_extra

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

write-to-fileatomic-write-filefs_extra
Health Score525856
Total Downloads9.1K4.8M214.2M
30d Downloads087.2K14.0M
Dependents921412.3K
Releases3109
Last Updated1524d ago306d ago1256d ago
Age4y 2m2y 10m9y 5m

Health Breakdown

write-to-file
Maintenance
4
Quality
21
Community
9
Popularity
5
Documentation
13
atomic-write-file
Maintenance
9
Quality
18
Community
11
Popularity
8
Documentation
12
fs_extra
Maintenance
3
Quality
21
Community
12
Popularity
8
Documentation
12

Technical Details

write-to-fileatomic-write-filefs_extra
Version1.0.20.3.01.3.0
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseMITBSD-3-ClauseMIT
Dependencies020
Crate Size4KB21KB31KB
Features070
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202120242018
MSRV1.85
Owners111

Quick Verdict

  • atomic-write-file leads with a health score of 58/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • fs_extra has the most downloads (214.2M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • fs_extra is depended on by 12.3K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • ⚠ write-to-file, fs_extra have not been updated in over a year.
  • atomic-write-file is pre-1.0 — API may change.