rustio rustio.net

zed-async-tar vs astral-tokio-tar vs tar

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

zed-async-tarastral-tokio-tartar
Health Score447069
Total Downloads105.1K11.4M165.5M
30d Downloads30.7K2.6M12.2M
Dependents133830.5K
Releases11181
Last Updated216d ago7d ago7d ago
Age7m1y 3m11y 6m

Health Breakdown

zed-async-tar
Maintenance
4
Quality
13
Community
9
Popularity
6
Documentation
12
astral-tokio-tar
Maintenance
19
Quality
14
Community
14
Popularity
8
Documentation
15
tar
Maintenance
19
Quality
13
Community
14
Popularity
8
Documentation
15

Technical Details

zed-async-tarastral-tokio-tartar
Version0.5.0-zed0.6.20.4.46
Stable (≥1.0)✗ No✗ No✗ No
LicenseMIT/Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0
Dependencies9108
Crate Size53KB68KB71KB
Features111
Yanked %0.0%0.0%1.2%
Edition201820212021
MSRV1.83.01.63
Owners3 (team)32

Quick Verdict

  • astral-tokio-tar leads with a health score of 70/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • tar has the most downloads (165.5M), suggesting wider adoption.
  • tar is depended on by 30.5K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.